Can Europe Build a Credible Nuclear Deterrent Without the U.S.?

Europe has long depended on the United States’ nuclear umbrella through NATO's nuclear-sharing arrangement, but with increasing geopolitical tensions and concerns over U.S. commitment, the question arises: Can Europe develop an independent nuclear deterrent?

Current Nuclear Capabilities in Europe

At present, only two European countries possess nuclear weapons:

1. France – Has an independent nuclear force, including submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs) and air-launched cruise missiles.
2. United Kingdom – Has nuclear-armed submarines but relies on U.S.-supplied Trident missiles and support.

Additionally, some NATO countries (Germany, Italy, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Turkey) participate in the NATO nuclear-sharing program, where U.S. nuclear weapons are stationed in Europe but remain under American control.

---

Why Europe Could Build an Independent Nuclear Deterrent

1. Technological & Industrial Capability

• European nations like France, Germany, and the UK have advanced military-industrial complexes.
• France already has nuclear-capable submarines, aircraft, and warheads.
• The UK, while reliant on U.S. missiles, has the technical expertise to develop indigenous capabilities if needed.

2. Economic Strength

• The European Union (EU) collectively has the world’s third-largest economy, meaning it could fund nuclear expansion.
• While expensive, a European-led nuclear deterrent could be financed through joint defense initiatives.

3. Existing Military Cooperation

• The European Defence Fund (EDF) and PESCO (Permanent Structured Cooperation) show increasing military integration.
• A European-led nuclear force could be structured similarly, potentially led by France and supported by Germany, Italy, and others.

---

Challenges to an Independent European Nuclear Deterrent

1. Political Divisions

• Germany and many EU countries are strongly anti-nuclear. Convincing them to fund or host nuclear weapons would be difficult.
• NATO members rely on U.S. deterrence and may be reluctant to shift away.
• The EU lacks a unified military command, making coordination complex.

2. Dependence on U.S. Technology

• The UK’s Trident missiles are U.S.-made and require American maintenance.
• NATO’s nuclear-sharing relies entirely on U.S. weapons and logistics.
• Developing new European missile systems would take decades and massive funding.

3. Legal and Treaty Constraints

• Many European nations have signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), limiting nuclear expansion.
• The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW), supported by many EU countries, opposes nuclear arms.

4. Cost and Timeframe

• A new nuclear program would require decades to develop credible long-range nuclear capabilities.
• France’s nuclear program took decades and billions of euros—scaling it up for all of Europe would be even costlier.

---

Potential Paths Forward

If Europe were to establish its own nuclear deterrent, it could take several approaches:

1. Strengthening France’s Nuclear Role

• France could expand its nuclear umbrella to cover more of Europe.
• Germany, Italy, and other EU nations could financially support French nuclear expansion in return for protection.

2. Creating a Joint European Nuclear Force

• A European Nuclear Command could be formed, pooling resources from multiple countries.
• This force could be based on French leadership, with financial and technological support from Germany and others.

3. Greater NATO Autonomy in Nuclear Policy

• Europe could push for greater control over NATO’s nuclear strategy, while still benefiting from U.S. support.
• This would reduce dependence on American decision-making but maintain a U.S. security guarantee.

Can Europe Do It?

While Europe has the economic and technological capability to build a nuclear deterrent, the biggest hurdles are political divisions, legal constraints, and reliance on U.S. technology.

In the short term, a fully independent European nuclear force is unlikely due to cost and opposition from some EU nations. However, a stronger role for France and greater European cooperation in nuclear policy could serve as a middle ground.